

This example notwithstanding, the series as a whole averts this trope. Considering the level of shape-shifting power apostles seem to have, a retractable penis isn't that much of a stretch of the imagination, but most Apostles seem to love flaunting their Body Horror and inhuman sexuality as much as possible and wouldn't bother to "retract" even if they could. However, since he is a demon it is likely that the "armor" is actually his skin, and he is completely naked, but then that raises the question of why no genitals are visible on him even when he is clearly facing the reader. In Berserk, when Griffith/Femto rapes Casca he appears to do this through his armor.It not only codes Suzu as sexually dominate, but frames her actions as if she was a man penetrating Matsuri.



See also Sex Dressed, when a couple's disheveled clothing makes it obvious that they've been doing the deed. Compare Wall Bang Her, which usually carries the implication that He and She were both just too horny to bother taking their clothes off. Couples engaged in public sex may wear as much clothing as possible for varying reasons, and depending on the circumstances (including temperature) it may not always be practical to completely disrobe. (Tab above)Ĭan be a case of Truth in Television. Genitalia in general is too hard-core for anything less than X-rated sex scenes (but are fine for PG-13 otherwise), and it's simply impossible to avoid seeing men's genitals while showing their "area" meanwhile, women typically wear loose lingerie to avoid showing even pubic hair.įor an analysis of why creators may choose to use this trope, take a look at the Analysis page. This is most obviously shown by the trope where, even after sex - or sometimes even during sex, when it's interrupted - men will be shown wearing boxer shorts apparently the message is that women also don't want to see a man's naked "area" - even while having sex with them. All that matters is seeing that sweet, sweet fanservice with the least amount of squick. It also ignores how painful sex with a metal zipper rubbing up against the genitals could be (although this particular problem could presumably be averted by having the man wear pants with a button-up fly instead). It doesn't matter that with his fly down and his belt off the guy's pants would fall down.
Figleaf bra Patch#
A skintone patch or a cover between legs can be completely hidden from the camera in a way that a penis can't), but the guy will still have his shirt on - or sometimes only his fly is down. The woman may be completely naked (or at least not wearing anything visible. Therefore, because Most Writers Are Male, men in sex scenes will be far more covered than women, even during intercourse. The assumption is that most heterosexual guys prefer seeing female flesh to seeing other naked guys. A form of soft-core "figleaf" male censorship, where men are shown wearing pants or underwear, in situations when they normally would be nude.įanservice most often is aimed at the straight male Demographic.
